The electronic edition is included into «The Index of Peer Reviewed Academic Journals and Publications That Must Publish the Main Academic Results of Candidate’s Degree Theses and Doctoral Degree Theses» that came in force on March 27, 2024

The main tasks of the online edition are:

• reflecting the results of research, scientific, practical and innovative activities of the teaching staff, students, graduate students and applicants of the Astrakhan State Medical University, as well as the teaching staff and researchers of universities and scientific organizations in Russia, the CIS countries and far abroad;
• organization of discussions on topical issues of science and practice of linguistics;
• expansion of the communicative space for interaction between Russian and foreign scientists;
• drawing attention to the most relevant, promising and interesting areas of linguistics;
• publication of research materials of young scientists;
• informing specialists and the public about the life of the international and national scientific community: about congresses, conferences, publications of monographs, lecture courses and manuals.

General requirements. The electronic version of the article is executed in a Microsoft Word text editor and saved with the .doc or .docx extension. The manuscript is sent through the personal account of the author on the website of the online edition.

Page parameters. A4 format (book). Margins: all 20 mm.

Formatting of the main text. Paragraph indentation 1.25 cm.

The line spacing of the article header is single; the text of the article is one and a half. Page numbering is located at the bottom of the page in the corner on the right. Times New Roman Font, Regular. The size of the pin (characters) is 14 pt.

The volume of the article. The minimum volume of the article is 8 pages, the maximum volume is up to 12 pages of typewritten text.

The article published in the online edition should consist of the following sequentially arranged elements:

• • "Scientific article" – on the left, font 12pt;
  • index (UDC) – on the left, font 12pt;
  • cipher of the scientific specialty and the corresponding branches of science, for which the article is presented in accordance with the Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated February 24, 2021 No. 118 – on the left, font 12pt;

• • 5.9.6 Languages of peoples of foreign countries (indicating a particular language or group of languages)
  • 5.9.8 Theoretical, applied and comparative linguistics
  • 5.9.5 Russian language
  • 5.8.2 Theory and methodology of training and education (by areas and levels of education)
  • 5.12.3 Interdisciplinary studies of language

• • title (name) of articles in Russian – centered, in capital letters, font 14pt, bold;
  • the author's first name, patronymic and surname in Russian – on the left, font 12pt, bold;
  • information about the place of work (study) of authors in Russian is indicated after the authors' names on different lines and linked to the names using superscript numeric designations) (name of the university, region, city, country) – on the left, font 12pt;
  • e-mail of the author(s), http://orcid.org/0000 ... – on the left, font 12pt
  • abstract in Russian – font 12pt;
  • keywords in Russian – font 12pt
  • "Original article" – on the left, font 12pt;
  • title (name) of articles in English – centered, in capital letters, font 14pt, bold;
  • first name, patronymic and surname of the author(s) – on the left, font 12pt, bold in English;
  • information about the place of work (study) of the authors in English (name of the university, region, city, country) – on the left, font 12pt;
  • abstract in English – font 12pt;
  • keywords – font 12pt;
  • the text of the article is 14pt font, one and a half interval;
  • the list of references is 12pt font, the interval is one.

The editorial board of the online edition recommends adhering to the traditional structure of writing an article (introduction, research objectives, research methods, results obtained, discussion of results and conclusions). The elements of the article are separated from each other by one empty line.

Abstract. The volume does not exceed 250 words.

Keywords. No less than 3 and no more than 15 words (phrases) that carry the main semantic load in the text.

List of sources. The list of cited literature is given in accordance with the requirements of GOST R 7.0.7–2021. Bibliographic entries in the list of non-textual bibliographic references are numbered and arranged in the order of citation of sources in the text of the article.

Bibliographic entry. To link the list of cited literature with the text of the article, references are used in accordance with GOST R 7.0.5-2008, References in the text of the article are enclosed in square brackets. The serial number of the cited source is given in the corresponding line of the text of the article, for example, [5]. If the link is given to a specific fragment of the document text, the reference indicates the serial number and pages on which the link object is placed. The information is separated by a comma, for example, [5, p. 23].

References are compiled in the order completely identical to the Russian-language version with a similar numbering.

References must be issued according to the following rules:

1. Authors (transliteration), the title of the article in transliterated version [translation of the title of the article into English in square brackets], the name of the Russian–language source (transliteration) [translation of the name of the source into English is a paraphrase (for journals, you can not to do)], output data with notation in English. For transliteration from Cyrillic to Latin, we recommend using the automatic transliteration system on the website http://www.translit.ru (by selecting the option "Interior Ministry").

2. It is forbidden to use the signs "//" and "-" to separate the structural elements of the bibliographic description.

Example:

Familija A.A. Nazvanie stat'i [Title of article]. Nazvanie zhurnala [Title of Journal], 2005. – Vol. 10. – No. 2. – Pp. 49-53.

• it is unacceptable to submit a description of the journal in References only in a transliterated version (without translation).;
• when describing publications without authors (collections, collective monographs), it is allowed to write one, maximum two editors of the publication instead of the authors;
• for unpublished documents, you can make the shortest name with an indication in parentheses (unpublished), if it has authorship (to take into account the author's references), or simply “Unpublished Source” or “Unpublished Report”, etc., if there is no authorship in the document;
• since Russian-language sources are difficult to identify by foreign experts, it is necessary to italicize the original name of the source in the descriptions, as in most foreign standards;
• it is undesirable to make arbitrary abbreviations of source names in links. This often leads to the loss of the bundle, as the name may not be identified;
• all the main output publishing information (in the descriptions of the journal: the designation of the volume, number, pages; in the descriptions of books: the place of publication – the city, the designation of the publishing house (except for the publisher's own untranslated name, it is transliterated)) must be submitted in English;
• in the descriptions of Russian-language textbooks, teaching aids, it is not necessary to indicate the type of publications;
• in the output data of publications in references (articles, books), the number of pages of the publication must be indicated: the range of pages in the publication is indicated by “Pp.” Before pages; the number of pages in the complete edition (book) - indicated as “p.” after specifying the number of pages;
• the translation of the title of the article or source is taken in square brackets;

• one publication is described in the list of references once, regardless of how many times the source was mentioned in the text of the publication;

• if the book in the list of references (in any version - main or in References) is described in full, then the description should indicate the full volume of the publication, regardless of which pages of the publication were cited in the text; the exception is when individual chapters from a book are used; in this version, the list of references gives a description of the chapter, indicating the pages “from-to”;

• for transliteration, it is necessary to use systems for automatically translating Cyrillic into the Roman alphabet; do not transliterate manually;

• for journals published in Russian and English, a link is given to the English version of the journal.

The following is a list of sources (“References”), arranged in the following order:

• all authors and the title of the article in a transliterated version (use the site https://translit.net/, selecting the BGN standard. The window for switching between standards is located above the line with the letters of the alphabet),

• translation of the title of the article into English in square brackets,

• the name of the Russian-language source in a transliterated version,

• translation of the source name into English in square brackets,

• output data with symbols in English.

Drawings, schemes, diagrams. No more than 3 figures are accepted as illustrations of articles. Illustrations must be clear. In the text of the article, a link to a specific figure should be given, for example, (Fig. 2). Figures should have a minimum number of words and symbols. Each figure must have a serial number, title and explanation of the meanings of all curves, numbers, letters and other symbols placed under the figure.

Photo. Attached photographs must be clear, suitable for scanning or in electronic form (.tif, jpg format).

Tables. There should be no more than 3 tables. Each table should be given a serial number and a heading. Abbreviation of words is allowed only in accordance with the requirements of GOST 7.12-93, 7.11-78. Tables must be provided in a Microsoft Word text editor (*.doc format) and numbered in order. The simultaneous use of tables and graphs (figures) to present the same results is not allowed.

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR PUBLISHED ARTICLES

1. Information about the author(s).

Information about the author(s) is sent to the email of the online edition lingv_edu@astgmu.ru in a separate file called Information_Surname. Information about the author(s), which contains data: last name, first name, patronymic in full; academic degree; academic title; place of work (department, institute (faculty)); position held; contact phone (work, cell); E-mail address.

Information in full is given in Russian and English.

The responsibility for the accuracy of the specified information lies with the author of the article.

2. Review. A scan of a review of an article by postgraduate students is sent to the e-mail of the online edition lingv_edu@astgmu.ru, and the e-mail of the editor-in-chief sanya-madzhaeva@yandex.ru in a separate file called Review_Surname. The review is compiled and certified by the supervisor or specialists in the subject area who have a doctorate / candidate of science degree.

Publication ethics

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only a simple way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Online edition Editors, Reviewers, Publishing House and Scientific Society for the online edition «Linguistics & Education».

1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all up-to-date recommendations in the published work.

1.3. The publisher is committed to the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our online edition programs provide an impartial «report» of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility for the proper presentation of these «reports», especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

2.1. Publication decision

The editor of the scientific online edition «Linguistics & Education» is personally and independently responsible for making the decision to publish, often in cooperation with the relevant Scientific Society. The credibility of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor may be subject to the policy of the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education», being limited by current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright, legality and plagiarism.

The Editor may confer with other Editors and Reviewers (or officers of the Scientific Society) during the decision to publish.

2.2. Decency

The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The Editor and the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» are obliged not to unnecessarily disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, with the exception of Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely: request a Co-Editor, Assistant Editor, or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board when reviewing work instead of personally reviewing and making a decision) in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies and possibly other organizations associated with the manuscript.

2.5. Publication oversight

An editor who provides compelling evidence that a statement or conclusion presented in a publication is erroneous should notify the Publisher (and/or the relevant Scientific Society) for prompt notification of changes, withdrawals, concerns, and other relevant statements.

2.6. Research engagement and collaboration

The Editor, in conjunction with the Publisher (or the Scientific Society), take appropriate action in the event of ethical claims regarding reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the argumentation of the corresponding complaint or requirement, but may also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board

Peer review helps the Editor make the decision to publish and, through appropriate interaction with Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communications, located at the very «heart» of the scientific approach. The publisher shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to a publication are required to do substantial peer review work.

3.2. Diligence

Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review a manuscript, or who does not have enough time to quickly complete the work, should notify the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» and ask to be excluded from the review process of the corresponding manuscript.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for peer review must be treated as a confidential document. This work may not be opened or discussed with anyone not authorized to do so by the Editor.

3.4. Manuscript requirements and objectivity

The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and reasonably express their opinion.

3.5. Recognition of primary sources

Reviewers should identify significant published work that is relevant to the topic and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. For any statement (observation, conclusion or argument) published earlier, the manuscript must have a corresponding bibliographic reference. The Reviewer should also draw the attention of the Editor to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript in question and any other published work that is within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2 Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of Authors

4.1. Manuscript Requirements

4.1.1 Authors of original research reports should provide credible results of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be accurately presented. The work must contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

4.1.2 Reviews and scientific articles must also be accurate and objective, the point of view of the Editors must be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage

The Editorial Board reserves the right to request from the Authors the original (raw) research data, including for provision to reviewers and editors. Authors should be prepared to provide this kind of information to editorial staff (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism

4.3.1 Authors must ensure that the work presented is entirely original and, in the case of using works or statements of other Authors, must provide appropriate bibliographic references or excerpts.

4.3.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as the author's, to copying or paraphrasing significant parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and is unacceptable.

4.4. Plurality, redundancy and simultaneity of publications

4.4.1 In general, an Author should not publish a manuscript mostly devoted to the same research in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

4.4.2 In general, the Author should not submit a previously published article for consideration to another journal.

4.4.3 Publishing a certain type of article (eg, clinical practice guidelines, translated articles) in more than one journal is ethical in some cases, subject to certain conditions. Authors and Editors of interested journals must agree to a secondary publication presenting necessarily the same data and interpretations as in the primary published work.

A bibliography of the primary work should also be included in the second publication. More information on acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found at www.icmje.orgwww.icmje.org.

4.5. Recognition of primary sources

The contribution of others must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, in the course of a conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as evaluation of manuscripts or awards of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the Authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Publication authorship

4.6.1 The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the concept of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Contributors. In those cases when research participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of research, they should be listed as having made significant contributions to the research.

4.6.2 The author must make sure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study are presented as Co-Authors and are not listed as Co-Authors those who did not participate in the study, that all Co-Authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.7.1 All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as affecting the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.7.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, stock ownership, royalties, expert opinion, patent application or patent registration, grants and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.8. Significant errors in published works

If the Author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» about this and interact with the Editor in order to withdraw the publication or correct errors as soon as possible. If the Editor or the Publisher receives information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the Publisher

5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the fulfillment of ethical obligations by the Editors, Reviewers and Authors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in accordance with these requirements. The Publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production does not influence the Editors' decisions.

5.2. The Publishing House should support the Editors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in considering complaints about the ethical aspects of published materials and help interact with other journals and / or Publishing Houses, if this contributes to the performance of duties by the Editors.

5.3. The publisher should promote good research practice and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, withdrawal procedures, and error correction.

5.4. The publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary.

The section was prepared based on the materials of the publishing house of scientific and medical literature Elsevier, as well as materials of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

The editorial board asks the authors to follow the rules set out below in the preparation of manuscripts. Manuscripts drawn up without observing these rules will not be considered by the editorial board.:

1. The requirements, which may be updated in the future, have been developed taking into account "Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to scientific journals."

2. The online edition "Linguistics & Education" accepts scientific reviews, original articles, normative and methodological documents, reviews and informational materials that have not been published before or accepted for publication in other printed or electronic publications. The use of more than 20% of another previously published text is not allowed.

3. The author guarantees that he has exclusive rights to use the material transferred to the Editorial Board in accordance with the current legislation regulating the turnover of intellectual property rights. In case of violation of this guarantee and claims against the Editorial Board in this regard, the author undertakes to settle all claims independently and at his own expense. The editorial board is not responsible to third parties for the violation of the guarantees given by the author.

4. In order to correctly reproduce the published material, it should be remembered that plagiarism is prohibited, which is expressed in the illegal use of someone else's work or someone else's ideas under one's own name, as well as in borrowing fragments of someone else's works without specifying the source of borrowing, in intentional attribution of authorship. Plagiarism is understood as verbatim copying, compilation, and paraphrasing of someone else's text. When using borrowings from another author's text, a link to the source is required. In case of confirmation of plagiarism or falsification of the results, the article is unconditionally rejected. In this connection, when submitting an original article to the Editorial Office, it is necessary to include an opinion on originality in the accompanying documents (http://www.antiplagiat.ru ).

5. The article should be carefully verified by the authors and signed by each of them. The editorial board of the online publication reserves the right to shorten and edit the materials of the article, regardless of their volume, including changing the titles of articles, terms and definitions. Minor corrections of a stylistic, nomenclatural or formal nature are made to the article without the consent of the author. If the article was processed by the author in the process of preparation for publication, the date of receipt of the article is the day the Editorial Office receives the final text.

6. The manuscript must be submitted electronically.

7. The text of the manuscript should correspond to the scientific style of speech, be clear and accurate, without long historical introductions, unreasonable repetitions and neologisms. A strict sequence of presentation of the material is necessary, subordinated to the logic of scientific research, with a clear distinction between the results obtained by the author from the relevant literature data and their interpretation.

8. In the section "Results and their discussion", you should state your own research results in a logical sequence, highlight only important observations; duplication of information in the text and in the illustrative material is not allowed. When discussing the results, new and relevant aspects of this study are highlighted, critically comparing them with other works in this field, and also emphasize the possibility of applying the results obtained in further research.

9. Conclusions should be linked to the purpose of the study, while unsubstantiated statements should be avoided.

10. All abbreviations of words and abbreviations, except for the generally accepted ones, should be deciphered at the first mention. In order to unify the text, at the subsequent mention, it is necessary to adhere to the abbreviations or abbreviations proposed by the author (with the exception of conclusions). The text of the article should not contain more than 5-7 abbreviations.

The author of the article is fully responsible for the accuracy of the information and the correctness of the bibliographic data.

1. Only original, unpublished materials in other publications are accepted for consideration by the online publication "Linguistics and Education". The authors are solely responsible for the scientific content of the article, references, citations and description of sources and literature, as well as for respecting the copyrights of third parties.

2. All materials received by the editors of the online publication "Linguistics and Education" after determining their compliance with the profile of the online publication and design requirements, are reviewed with the involvement of Russian and foreign scientists.

3. All reviewers are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article over the past 3 years.

4. The reviewer is appointed by the decision of the editorial board of the online publication.

5. One of the main requirements of peer review is confidentiality.

6. The review procedure is anonymous for both reviewers and authors. Violation of confidentiality is possible only if the reviewer claims that the materials presented in the article are unreliable or falsified.

7. The reviewer is notified that the submitted manuscripts are the intellectual property of the authors and are classified as confidential information. The reviewer is not allowed to transfer the information contained in the articles to third parties who are not members of the editorial board.

8. The subject of analysis in peer-reviewed articles are: compliance with the design of the article with the requirements of the online publication; relevance, novelty and scientific and practical significance of the work; the adequacy of the methods and scope of the study; correctness and adequacy of statistical data processing; the reliability of the results and conclusions, as well as the correspondence between the title of the work and the content of the article. In addition, the quality and style of providing scientific information in the article is evaluated (see review form)

9. Reviewing an article can take up to three weeks

10. Based on the results of the review, the article may be rejected, sent to the author for revision or accepted for publication.

11. The editors of the journal send copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials. The responsible secretary brings the decision to the attention of the author.

12. The original reviews are kept by the editorial board for a year. The editors of the online publication do not store manuscripts that are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts accepted for publication will not be returned.

13. If the review contains recommendations for correcting the article, the article is sent to the author for revision. In this case, the date of receipt by the editorial office is the date of return of the revised article. If necessary, the article can be re-submitted for review to the same reviewer who made the comments.

14. If the author is unable or unwilling to take into account the wishes of the editorial board or reviewer, the editors reserve the right to reject the articles.

15. In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned answer to the editors of the online publication. The article can be sent for re-reviewing, or for approval by the editorial board.

16. The decision to publish after review is made by the editor-in-chief, and, if necessary, by the editorial board as a whole.

17. Articles are evaluated by members of the editorial board, specialists from the Astrakhan State Medical University or other universities according to the profile corresponding to the content of the article. The article is sent for review without indicating the full name. and other data allowing to identify the author. The author has the right to familiarize himself with the completed review.

Publication in the online edition for authors is free.

VAC

UDK